The course was an exploration of the history, culture, archaeology and sociology of the city of Athens, Greece.
The course fulfilled the upper-level writing requirement for undergraduate students in the College of Literature, Science and Arts at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Course Information Course Number/ID:
Modern Greek 325
Course Length (number of weeks):
12
Course Delivery Mode:
In-Class
Average Number of Enrolled Students:
Between 30 and 60 students
Course Development & Delivery Course Contributors:
Prof. Artemis Leontis was the primary instructor for the course. I was the graduate student instructor for the course, and was responsible for innovating the website for the course using Sakai , working with Prof. Leontis.
Course Development:
This course was a seminar that I was assigned to assist in teaching in the capacity of a graduate student instructor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
The course served to fulfill theupper-level college writing requirement, in addition to being a seminar. This meant that the course had a dual purpose: on the one hand, it served to hone the writing skills of the students taking it, and on the other, it functioned as a seminar in which freshman students had the space to discuss and reflect on the selected topic (the theme of the course) over the course of the entire semester in a seminar-style setting.
Course Delivery:
Since this was both a writing course and a seminar-style course, the course had two different objectives which were challenging to reconcile. A seminar implies collaboration among students, whereas we are accustomed to think of writing as a highly individual and personal activity.
I met this challenge by using the Wiki tool in Sakai in a creative way. For each assignment, I divided the students into groups, and set up a Wiki page in which each student could find their group listed, as a clickable link. Once the student clicked on his/her group's name on the Wiki page, he/she would be taken to his/her group's page on the Wiki. On that group page, he/she would find her name listed, along with that of her group members. Clicking on his/her name would take him/her to his/her own page, where he/she would write her essay or abstract. His/her group members, as well as the instructor, would then be able to leave feedback on that page, in the form of comments on the writing.
This preserved the emphasis on writing as an intensely personal and individual activity, undertaken alone and in privacy, but also enabled collaboration by creating the opportunity for members of one's small-group to comment and provide feedback in an interactive way. The great advantage to this was that all the commenters, as well as the instructor, were able to read each other's comments.
I also made use of the Wiki tool in a creative way to satisfy an administrative need of the class: reserving appointment slots to meet with the instructor. This led to optimal utilization of office hours, by allowing students to enter their names, via Sakai 's wiki tool, for open time slots. This eliminated the need for going back-and-forth by email trying to set up appointments.
Course Self-Assessment Communication & Collaboration Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Communication & Collaboration Evidence:
Students' positive comments.
Learning Material Self-Assessment:
Effective
Learning Material Evidence:
Visibly enhanced class discussion and heightened student interest.
Learning Outcomes & Assessment Self-Assessment:
Effective
Learning Outcomes & Assessment Evidence:
Students' positive comments.
Course Look & Feel, Web Usability Self-Assessment:
Effective
Course Look & Feel, Web Usability Evidence:
Students' positive comments.
Learner Support Self-Assessment:
Not Evident
Learner Support Evidence:
Teaching Innovation Teaching Innovation:
Students do not usually think of the writing experience as a collaborative experience, and collaboration among students is usually not stressed in writing classes. I believe I found an innovative way to make the writing experience collaborative using Sakai 's wiki tool.