Student affairs and higher education professionals are employed by a wide variety of institutions, yet most often, our coursework and research focuses on traditional, four-year, public institutions. However, in this course students will study the community college and its role in American higher education. The history, purpose, mission, functions, and critiques of community colleges make up the course’s first module. In module two, areas related to student life at community colleges will be examined; they include access, persistence, and culture. Administration, governance, and leadership together with consideration of community college faculty and staff are the subjects of the third module. The emphasis of module four is on instructional technology, internationalization, and enrollment management. Finally, module five encompasses policy and politics, institutional change and effectiveness, assessment and strategic planning, and concludes the course.
Students in this hybrid course will be engaged in ongoing and lively online and face to face discussion, group work, critical thinking and reading, and collaborative learning activities. Further, each student will “adopt” a community college as a means to add real-world conversation about the history, current state, and future of the American community college. This will require students to engage in ongoing research, reflection and application.
Course Objectives
As a result of this course, students will be able to:
1. Trace the historical roots and evolution of the American community college.
2. Describe the mission, goals and functions of the American community college.
3. Explain the contribution of the community college to American higher education.
4. Outline the multiple roles played by community college student affairs professionals, administrators, and faculty.
5. Assess the needs and describe the composition of the diverse community college student body.
6. Compare and contrast the governance, leadership, administration and institutional culture of the American
community college with other colleges and universities.
7. Critically assess literature on the American community college
8. Formulate a position on issues related the function(s) and future of the American community college.
9. Evaluate if a career in the community college system is of interest.
10. Write more concisely, coherently, and analytically, using APA style guidelines.
Course Information Course Number/ID:
SP08 IN EDUC 656 C7120
Course Length (number of weeks):
16
Course Delivery Mode:
Hybrid (fewer than five face-to-face interactions)
Average Number of Enrolled Students:
Between 10 and 30 students
Course Development & Delivery Course Contributors:
Genevieve G. Shaker
Graduate Teaching Assistant
425 University Blvd
Cavanaugh Hall 441
IUPUI
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Tom Janke
Instructional Technology Consultant
755 W. Michigan Street, UL 1125
IUPUI
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Course Development:
We approached the course development by first determining our learning outcomes and then designing learning activities and assignments that were strategically aligned with the course goals . As Moore and colleagues suggest (2008), employing emerging technology requires close attention to structural course characteristics and learning outcomes. There is no doubt that it can be challenging to combine learning outcomes and technology. This required us determine the fit between medium and expected learning outcome and realize that course tasks and assignments often had to be reframed for use in the online or hybrid environment. For example, we agreed with Prensky (2007) and felt that it was necessary to use multiple tools in order to ensure ongoing student engagement, meet individual student needs, and provide a well-grounded learning experience.
We were confident that when used effectively, emerging technologies like wikis and blogs could provide an immediate opportunity for us to be a facilitator of learning rather than the central source. In designing the course we reminded ourselves that, “Today’s students are motivated by solving real-world problems, preferring to do rather than simply listen, and most educators consider learning-by-doing the most effective way to learn. Immersive and authentic learning environments, such as simulations, visualizations …and virtual worlds can be both engaging and motivating” (Oblinger, 2008, p. 21). Finally we, as Fitcher (2005) suggests, designed the course in such a way that the implementation of technology was not simply an add-on for its own sake but an integral course component, which wholly supported our learning goals.
The course was not without its problems. We pushed technology to its limit and at least twice lost a small amount of valuable synchronous course time because of technical glitches. However, because we believed that innovation and creativity should be part of the learning experience, we used these problems as a means for discussion and reflection with our students about the challenges and opportunities that instructional technology provides.
Course Delivery:
This hybrid course involved synchronous and asynchronous learning opportunities. Further, employed a wide-range of tools in the delivery of the course such as wikis, discussion forums, chats, Adobe connect meetings, polycom (TV) conferencing, and blogs. Research on learning theory makes clear that variety, active engagement and high expectations are the pinnacles of good teaching (see for example, Svinicki, 2004). Further, “there is increasing evidence that today’s youth will need and expect a very different learning environment from the one their parents and teachers experienced” (Waterhouse, 2005, p. 41). When designing this hybrid course, we knew that student-centered learning had to be at the heart of learning activities. We would employ technology if it was value-added and was a piece of the educational puzzle rather than just an add-on or tool.
It our belief that sound pedagogical principles like frequent feedback , active learning, and the social construction of knowledge can be made easier with the effective use of instructional technology. For example, a wiki, by its very definition, is a way for students to socially construct knowledge (Watson & Harper, 2008). We believed that constructivist practices also could be advanced using Sakai because it provides a framework through which a student makes a series of choices about how they will access and order their learning activities (Waterhouse, 2005). Further, by adopting Web 2.0 tools we were embracing the collaborative nature of learning and knowledge construction (Watson & Harper, 2008).
Course Self-Assessment Communication & Collaboration Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Communication & Collaboration Evidence:
The course was designed in Sakai to ensure that students would collaborate on a wide range of projects and use a variety of technologies. Chat enabled students to gather early in the semester and become comfortable online. Forums were used to review readings and engage in debates and discussions. The wiki was used for the semester-long Adopt a Community College assignment, enabling students to learn not just about their own institution but also to read and make comparisons to the adopted institutions of their classmates. Within the wiki, students completed 6 different assignments, posting text, charts, and papers to create an evolving and collaborative array of resources and shared experiences. Sakai was complimented by the use of a blog. Adobe Connect enabled the class to meet and interact in real time using web cameras and microphones. Students participated in polls, interacted with guest speakers, and collaboratively designed research studies. The students were provided with regular opportunities to comment on and contribute to the work of others. Activities and assignments completed in the different technological venues were sometimes graded and sometimes for participation credit only. In this way the reward structure provided many opportunities for students to succeed; nonthreatening and diverse, this encouraged students’ to participate fully both for their own sake and that of their classmates.
Learning Material Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Learning Material Evidence:
The visual design of the course homepage clearly communicated the course components and structure through its navigation system. The course was divided into 5 structural modules, nesting course topics within spans of 2 to 5 week periods. Each module included the form of each class (synchronous, asynchronous, video/TV polycom meetings), readings with links to those available digitally, and assignments due. Written language was embedded in the page to reiterate syllabus information about assignments and expectations. Together, this ensured ease of access and a regularized manner of keeping course expectations in front of the students.
The two texts used for the course were supplemented with current articles from both popular and scholarly sources. Key web resources about community colleges as well as links to valuable online publications were provided within the course navigation structure. Guest speakers joined the class live and via audio recording to address the content through discussion and interaction.
Meetings held online in the Adobe Connect environment were recorded and posted for students to review online after-the-fact. This also enabled those who were absent to catch up and those who were present to go back and revisit portions of the session.
Learning Outcomes & Assessment Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Learning Outcomes & Assessment Evidence:
Course goals were strategically developed in conjunction with selection of texts and supplemental materials and assignments tightly aligned with these goals. During each class objectives for the session were shared. Students interacted with instructors and one another in a myriad of ways including in person, via live video, through forums, using web cameras and microphones, and live chats. The range of course strategies allowed us to consider multiple aspects of the students’ growth and development. At the same time, the diversity encouraged critical thinking , refinement of written and oral communication skills , and creativity. Students reflected regularly and created materials from which their classmates could learn (including a narrated PowerPoint, a quiz, and a learning activity). Students also reflected on what they learned to design their dream community college. Within a range, students were able to place a point value for each assignment and for their course participation. This enabled students to be deeply engaged in creating their own parameters for success. Students completed a mid-semester evaluation as well as writing assignments to provide ongoing feedback . Feedback was used to make adjustments to the course. Additionally, students received numerous formative assessments. An end-of-course evaluation (behind the typical one used for all courses) will also be posted online.
Course Look & Feel, Web Usability Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Course Look & Feel, Web Usability Evidence:
As mentioned, the course was divided into five topical modules to help the students engage with the material and to plan their time during the semester. By locating the modules within the course management navigation system, the students could refer to the modules quickly and easily. The modules, the syllabus, and the course homepage all featured a custom banner across the top to create a friendly and recognizable environment for the students.
The online course environment provided the necessary tools for assignment completion as well as links to any other required online resources and tools. Course readings were located within the resources area of the online environment as were documents shared by the students with their peers.
Presented in a consistent and functional manner, information about expectations for each course assignment was provided online as well as within the syllabus. Content was provided by the instructors through media including PowerPoint, informal quizzes and games, digital audio, and from multiple external online resources.
Learner Support Self-Assessment:
Excellent
Learner Support Evidence:
Links for support are readily available within the online environment. Instructors were available to assist students with technological difficulties and provide support in completion and submission of all assignments. Flexible solutions were sought when challenges were experienced. The syllabus included a section with information about special expectations and demands of online courses. Included in the syllabus were introductions to the many technologies within the course and students’ roles in navigating these technologies. Each technology was explained to ensure that students at all levels, and with various technological experiences, would have the necessary background to complete the course assignments. Instructions were provided inside the online environment to aid students in the creation of the wiki, blog postings, and forum discussions. Prior to the first Adobe connect meeting, instructors were available at two different times (two hour windows) to allow students to test their connection, camera, microphones and become familiar with the program. Regularly over the semester, announcements were made to help guide the students through the course assignments and to prepare them for each class meeting. Some of these announcements were planned together with the course; others were prepared and provided as the need arose. Conversations from office hours and student feedback were used to make adjustments to the course technology and structure.
Teaching Innovation Teaching Innovation:
Oblinger’s quote “Net Generation students expect to be engaged by their environment, with participatory, sensory-rich, experiential activities (either physical or virtual) and opportunities for input. They are more oriented to visual media than previous generations – and prefer to learn by doing rather than by telling or reading. ‘Don’t just tell us – let us discover ‘” (2008, p. 13), along with scores of other research on the needs of learners, inspired us to think differently about how to deliver this graduate level course. With the needs and experiences of our students in mind, we were able to use the tools in Sakai to more fully reach our learners. Specifically, this is the first course in the higher education program that has been delivered primarily online. Further, this course was designed to advance the principles of effective educational practice as outlined by Chickering and Gamson (1987). This was done by harnessing the many tools available within (and outside of) Sakai to move student learning to the center of the course. Students were given choices, control, and room for experimentation. Further, students were challenged to learn how to express what they learned from the literature, experts, and the realities of their adopted community college in a variety of genres. The assessment of student learning did not rest on one or two measures nor did it rely on one or two methods. Students were challenged to learn how to express themselves in blogs, narrated PowerPoint, in wiki postings, chats, orally, and in scholarly papers. Students were also expected to be an active part of the community of learners. This occurred via students developing quiz materials and learning activities, in chat sessions, and through the use of a wiki and blog. Although students received instruction and guidance, it was up to them to make the most out of the experience. Students were engaged in high levels of writing, communicating, and group work. The online elements of the course required thorough and critical reading. Further, students interacted with classmates and instructors more often than in a many of their face-to-face classes. Finally, they were required to use new media tools and express themselves in new ways. An important part of the class was the exploration and evaluation of various teaching and learning methods. This is evidenced by a student’s comment in mid-semester evaluation, “I was at first rather leery about using the full complement of Sakai features, and am still not a fan of the blog (mainly because I've not embraced that form of media communication), but…the variety of learning activities pushes me past the comfort zone and challenges me, and though I may not always like it, I do appreciate how it improves the learning process. This experience has also introduced instructional design features that I can hopefully incorporate in my own repertoire of future teaching endeavors.”
Optional (screenshots, links)